Jeep Compass 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Compass) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 30 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 290 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 1.9 l/100km + 19.1 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.80 € | 9.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 133 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`660 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |