Jeep Compass 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Compass) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 117 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |