Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016

 
Jeep Compass
2017 - 2020
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP150 HP
Torque: 250 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 secondsn/a seconds
Jeep Compass engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Ford Kuga.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.98.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km10.6 l/100km
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
620 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.52 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.64 m1.69 m
Jeep Compass is smaller.
Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres456 litres
Jeep Compass has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 28 00016 000
Pros and Cons: Jeep Compass has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Kuga has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv