Jeep Compass 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |