Jeep Compass 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 14 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kadjar scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |