Jeep Compass 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2013: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 119 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |