Jeep Compass 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2013: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 131 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |