Jeep Compass 2013 vs BMW X1 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2013: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is larger. Jeep Compass is 1 cm longer than the BMW X1, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Jeep Compass has 38 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
BMW X1 has
| |