Jeep Compass 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 39 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2013: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 119 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |