Jeep Compass 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 48 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 3 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 564 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 106 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |