Jeep Compass 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2012 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota RAV4 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 119 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |