Jeep Compass 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 54 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Compass has 53 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |