Jeep Compass 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 131 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |