Jeep Compass 2013 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 48 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.0 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Compass has 38 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
BMW X1 has
| |