Jeep Compass 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 84 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Compass has 53 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |