Jeep Compass 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012

 
Jeep Compass
2013 - 2016
Honda CR-V
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP150 HP
Torque: 190 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.4 seconds
Jeep Compass engine produces 6 HP more power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.9
Jeep Compass consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway920 km on highway
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.57 m
Width: 1.81 m1.82 m
Height: 1.66 m1.69 m
Jeep Compass is smaller.
Jeep Compass is 11 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres589 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1669 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Jeep Compass has 131 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`100
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 740012 600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Compass has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv