Jeep Compass 2011 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 7 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Hyundai ix35. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.2 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 263 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 167 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai ix35 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |