Jeep Compass 2011 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Compass) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Fiat Freemont) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass and Fiat Freemont have the same engine power, but Jeep Compass torque is 130 NM less than Fiat Freemont. Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 44 cm shorter than the Fiat Freemont, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 328 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1461 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Freemont (by 192 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Fiat Freemont scores higher in safety tests. The Fiat Freemont scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |