Jeep Compass 2011 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 48 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Kia Sportage are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 236 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.58 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.22 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Sportage scores higher in safety tests. The Kia Sportage scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |