Jeep Compass 2011 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 48 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 263 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 167 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai ix35 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |