Jeep Compass 2011 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass and Hyundai ix35 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 263 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai ix35 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |