Jeep Compass 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Jeep Compass and Ford Kuga have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.4 | |
Jeep Compass consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 82 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |