Jeep Compass 2011 vs BMW X1 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 41 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Compass consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Compass consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
| Jeep Compass and BMW X1 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 92 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 81 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
BMW X1 has
| |