Jeep Compass 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 421 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |