Jeep Compass 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 12 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 955 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 222 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Compass (by 322 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |