Jeep Compass 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. Toyota RAV4 2009: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 6 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 116 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 475 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |