Jeep Compass 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.5 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |