Jeep Compass 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 421 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |