Jeep Compass 2006 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, but Jeep Compass torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Tiguan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 136 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |