Jeep Compass 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 11 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 34 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Jeep Compass has 150 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |