Jeep Compass 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 76 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 236 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |