Jeep Compass 2006 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 44 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.1 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1277 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 257 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 159 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`140 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |