Jeep Compass 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 170 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 380 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 10.7 seconds | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.5 - 5.3 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |