Jeep Compass 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Jeep Compass is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 380 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.7 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.1 - 9.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 - 215 mm (7.8 - 8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1693 litres | 1982 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`126 kg | ~ 2`195 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`545 kg | ~ 1`571 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 581 kg | ~ 624 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |