Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 170 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 380 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 10.7 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1653 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`207 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |