Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Compass
2017 - 2021
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Jeep Compass is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types.

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP120 - 242 HP
Torque: 230 - 380 NM230 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 10.7 seconds8.8 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 2.1 - 9.44.4 - 8.7
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.52 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.64 m1.69 m
Jeep Compass is smaller.
Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 770 litres456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1693 litres1653 litres
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Compass (by 40 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight: ~ 2`126 kg~ 2`207 kg
Net weight:~ 1`545 kg~ 1`670 kg
Load capacity:~ 581 kg~ 537 kg
Safety:
Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 20 40011 600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Compass has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • roomier boot
Ford Kuga has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv