Jeep Compass 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 170 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 10.9 seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.0 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Compass has 53 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`030 | ~ 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
| |