Jeep Compass 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 170 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 10.9 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.0 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 10 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 131 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`030 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |