Jeep Compass 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Compass
2013 - 2016
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.41.6 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 136 - 170 HP114 - 150 HP
Torque: 190 - 320 NM154 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 10.9 seconds10.2 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 9.04.6 - 8.1
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.30 m
Width: 1.81 m1.77 m
Height: 1.66 m1.62 m
Jeep Compass is larger.
Jeep Compass is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres442 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1219 litres
Jeep Compass has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`030~ 2`005
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 820011 400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Compass has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv