Jeep Compass 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 170 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 10.9 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.0 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
Jeep Compass is larger. Jeep Compass is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 442 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
Jeep Compass has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`030 | ~ 2`005 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |