Jeep Compass 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 170 HP | 150 - 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 310 NM | 317 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 11.3 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 6.9 - 11.2 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 421 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`980 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |