Jeep Compass 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 170 HP | 106 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 310 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 11.3 seconds | 11.5 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 7.0 - 9.4 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 35 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Compass is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Jeep Compass has 150 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`980 | ~ 1`888 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |