Jeep Compass 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Compass is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Qashqai can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Qashqai also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 170 HP | 106 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 310 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 11.3 seconds | 10 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Compass are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Qashqai. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 5.4 - 8.4 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1277 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 236 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`980 kg | ~ 1`984 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`603 kg | ~ 1`419 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 377 kg | ~ 565 kg | |
| Jeep Compass load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |