Jeep Commander 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 326 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 543 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 55 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.5 | 15.6 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`299 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |