Jeep Commander 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 288 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Commander engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 14.4 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Commander has 489 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |