Jeep Commander 2006 vs Saab 9-7X 2005

 
Jeep Commander
2006 - 2010
Saab 9-7X
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.7 Petrol4.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 231 HP290 HP
Torque: 410 NM373 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.9 seconds
Saab 9-7X is a more dynamic driving.
Jeep Commander engine produces 59 HP less power than Saab 9-7X, but torque is 37 NM more than Saab 9-7X. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.813.5
The Saab 9-7X is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Commander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Saab 9-7X, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 78 litres83 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
Saab 9-7X gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.81 m
Width: 1.90 m1.92 m
Height: 1.83 m1.74 m
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher.
Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Saab 9-7X, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 212 litres1127 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1950 litresno data
Saab 9-7X has more luggage space.
Jeep Commander has 915 litres less trunk space than the Saab 9-7X.
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`540
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 90005800
Pros and Cons:
    Saab 9-7X has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv