Jeep Commander 2006 vs Porsche Cayenne 2007

 
Jeep Commander
2006 - 2010
Porsche Cayenne
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.7 Petrol3.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 231 HP290 HP
Torque: 410 NM385 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.5 seconds
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving.
Jeep Commander engine produces 59 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 25 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.812.9
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Commander consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 78 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
630 km on highway1010 km on highway
Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Commander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 15 years3 years
Engine spread: Used also on Jeep Grand CherokeeUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.80 m
Width: 1.90 m1.93 m
Height: 1.83 m1.70 m
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher.
Jeep Commander is 1 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 212 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1950 litres1770 litres
Jeep Commander has 328 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 180 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`945
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 92009400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Commander has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Porsche Cayenne has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv