Jeep Commander 2006 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Commander engine produces 46 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 64 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 10.6 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Grand Cherokee | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 5 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Lexus RX has
| |