Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 303 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 93 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 12.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |