Jeep Commander 2006 vs Lexus RX 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 303 HP | 277 HP | |
Torque: | 445 NM | 346 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Jeep Commander engine produces 26 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 10.6 | |
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 21 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.92 m | 1.69 m | |
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 5 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 23 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`545 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9400 | 12 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Lexus RX has
| |