Jeep Commander 2006 vs Lexus RX 2009

 
Jeep Commander
2006 - 2010
Lexus RX
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.7 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 303 HP277 HP
Torque: 445 NM346 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds8 seconds
Jeep Commander engine produces 26 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.910.6
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Commander consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 495 litres more fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years20 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.74 m
Width: 1.90 m1.89 m
Height: 1.92 m1.69 m
Jeep Commander is larger.
Jeep Commander is 5 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 23 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Commander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`9002`545
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 880013 600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Commander has
  • more power
  • lower price
Lexus RX has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv