Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 212 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1940 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 401 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 2`680 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |