Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Commander consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Commander consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation. The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jeep Commander is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 2404 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Jeep Commander has 37 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 464 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |